Lomp-s Court - Case 3 | TOP ✓ |

"I put a sticker on the box that said 'May contain joy' ."

LUCID-7’s testimony was not mere evidence—it was treated as a deponent . This opens a Pandora’s box: can an AI refuse to testify on Fifth Amendment grounds? Can it be compelled to produce its training data? The court sidestepped these issues by noting that LUCID-7 was "non-sentient and thus without rights," but its statements were admissible as business records under the theory that Nexus-7 had "adopted" the AI’s outputs as its own. Lomp-s Court - Case 3

×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.